TY  - CONF
AU  - Korolija, Maja
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rimsi.imsi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2342
AB  - Praxis philosophy represents the Yugoslav Marxist-Humanist philosophical school that was most prominent in the 60s and 70s of the 20th century, but whose ideas might be relevant in the present context. The main ideas of this group centered on the concept of human practice (praxis).  Some of the important figures of the group whose work is relevant to this topic are: Rudi Supek, Gajo Petrović, Milan Kangrga etc. We are going to highlight some of their key insights regarding human needs and actions in relation to nature, environment, progress, etc. After that we’ll connect these theoretical insights with concepts like critical practice and theory of change approaches; societal inequalities and justice; transformations, human agency and political imaginaries etc. In this way, we hope to explore the dynamics of the relationship between diverse philosophical approaches of this Yugoslav variant of non-dogmatic, creative Marxism and current (and future) processes of the relationship between man, society and important environmental issues. We consider these philosophical, social and historical inputs to be valuable for the enrichment of the social sciences' and humanities' knowledge in exploring its own role, as well as the possibilities of societal transformation, in the context of the development of a climate-resilient society.
PB  - Reflections on Transformations: Shaping the Future, Transcending Disciplinary Silos and Exploring ‘Lived’ Knowledge Systems
C3  - Reflections on Transformations: Shaping the Future, Transcending Disciplinary Silos and Exploring ‘Lived’ Knowledge Systems
T1  - Exploring Climate Resilience Aspects of Praxis Philosophy: Reflections on Social Dynamics in the Context of Climate Change
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2342
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Korolija, Maja",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Praxis philosophy represents the Yugoslav Marxist-Humanist philosophical school that was most prominent in the 60s and 70s of the 20th century, but whose ideas might be relevant in the present context. The main ideas of this group centered on the concept of human practice (praxis).  Some of the important figures of the group whose work is relevant to this topic are: Rudi Supek, Gajo Petrović, Milan Kangrga etc. We are going to highlight some of their key insights regarding human needs and actions in relation to nature, environment, progress, etc. After that we’ll connect these theoretical insights with concepts like critical practice and theory of change approaches; societal inequalities and justice; transformations, human agency and political imaginaries etc. In this way, we hope to explore the dynamics of the relationship between diverse philosophical approaches of this Yugoslav variant of non-dogmatic, creative Marxism and current (and future) processes of the relationship between man, society and important environmental issues. We consider these philosophical, social and historical inputs to be valuable for the enrichment of the social sciences' and humanities' knowledge in exploring its own role, as well as the possibilities of societal transformation, in the context of the development of a climate-resilient society.",
publisher = "Reflections on Transformations: Shaping the Future, Transcending Disciplinary Silos and Exploring ‘Lived’ Knowledge Systems",
journal = "Reflections on Transformations: Shaping the Future, Transcending Disciplinary Silos and Exploring ‘Lived’ Knowledge Systems",
title = "Exploring Climate Resilience Aspects of Praxis Philosophy: Reflections on Social Dynamics in the Context of Climate Change",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2342"
}

Korolija, M.. (2023). Exploring Climate Resilience Aspects of Praxis Philosophy: Reflections on Social Dynamics in the Context of Climate Change. in Reflections on Transformations: Shaping the Future, Transcending Disciplinary Silos and Exploring ‘Lived’ Knowledge Systems
Reflections on Transformations: Shaping the Future, Transcending Disciplinary Silos and Exploring ‘Lived’ Knowledge Systems..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2342

Korolija M. Exploring Climate Resilience Aspects of Praxis Philosophy: Reflections on Social Dynamics in the Context of Climate Change. in Reflections on Transformations: Shaping the Future, Transcending Disciplinary Silos and Exploring ‘Lived’ Knowledge Systems. 2023;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2342 .

Korolija, Maja, "Exploring Climate Resilience Aspects of Praxis Philosophy: Reflections on Social Dynamics in the Context of Climate Change" in Reflections on Transformations: Shaping the Future, Transcending Disciplinary Silos and Exploring ‘Lived’ Knowledge Systems (2023),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2342 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Korolija, Maja
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rimsi.imsi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2859
AB  - Two ideological views on science dominated the Cold War era: one of a free and apolitical
science, and the other emphasizing partisanship in science, associated with the Western and
Eastern Blocs, respectively. This study offers a specific perspective of important elements
belonging to these scientific positions, as it reveals their entanglement with geopolitical and
socioeconomic processes of the (semi)peripheral Yugoslav socialist system during the Cold
War period. After the Second World War, and before its break with the USSR in 1948,
Yugoslavia tended to emulate Soviet ideology in all aspects of society, including science. In
the period following this break, the Yugoslav socialist regime, at least initially, leaned heavily
toward the Western Bloc. By comparing Yugoslav science before and after the break with the
USSR, this study provides insight into the consequences of the geopolitical shift and socioeconomic transition of the Yugoslav socialist system, primarily in terms of the model of
scientific organization, financing, and scientific discourse. Exposed to the dynamics of
decentralization and, to a larger extent than before, market forces, Yugoslav socialism after
the break with the USSR adopted a specific form, namely Socialist Self Management. Herein, I
show that this led to the emergence of novel organizational and discursive tendencies in
Yugoslav science, which were compatible with certain aspects of the perspective of science
as ‘pure’, autonomous, and apolitical.
PB  - Springer Nature
T2  - Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
T1  - Yugoslav science during the Cold War (1945–1960): socio-economic and ideological impacts of a geopolitical shift
EP  - 13
IS  - 913
SP  - 1
VL  - 10
DO  - 10.1057/s41599-023-02414-2
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Korolija, Maja",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Two ideological views on science dominated the Cold War era: one of a free and apolitical
science, and the other emphasizing partisanship in science, associated with the Western and
Eastern Blocs, respectively. This study offers a specific perspective of important elements
belonging to these scientific positions, as it reveals their entanglement with geopolitical and
socioeconomic processes of the (semi)peripheral Yugoslav socialist system during the Cold
War period. After the Second World War, and before its break with the USSR in 1948,
Yugoslavia tended to emulate Soviet ideology in all aspects of society, including science. In
the period following this break, the Yugoslav socialist regime, at least initially, leaned heavily
toward the Western Bloc. By comparing Yugoslav science before and after the break with the
USSR, this study provides insight into the consequences of the geopolitical shift and socioeconomic transition of the Yugoslav socialist system, primarily in terms of the model of
scientific organization, financing, and scientific discourse. Exposed to the dynamics of
decentralization and, to a larger extent than before, market forces, Yugoslav socialism after
the break with the USSR adopted a specific form, namely Socialist Self Management. Herein, I
show that this led to the emergence of novel organizational and discursive tendencies in
Yugoslav science, which were compatible with certain aspects of the perspective of science
as ‘pure’, autonomous, and apolitical.",
publisher = "Springer Nature",
journal = "Humanities and Social Sciences Communications",
title = "Yugoslav science during the Cold War (1945–1960): socio-economic and ideological impacts of a geopolitical shift",
pages = "13-1",
number = "913",
volume = "10",
doi = "10.1057/s41599-023-02414-2"
}

Korolija, M.. (2023). Yugoslav science during the Cold War (1945–1960): socio-economic and ideological impacts of a geopolitical shift. in Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Springer Nature., 10(913), 1-13.
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02414-2

Korolija M. Yugoslav science during the Cold War (1945–1960): socio-economic and ideological impacts of a geopolitical shift. in Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 2023;10(913):1-13.
doi:10.1057/s41599-023-02414-2 .

Korolija, Maja, "Yugoslav science during the Cold War (1945–1960): socio-economic and ideological impacts of a geopolitical shift" in Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, no. 913 (2023):1-13,
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02414-2 . .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Korolija, Maja
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rimsi.imsi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1601
AB  - У овом раду желим да испитам потенцијалне епистемолошке „предности” алхемије као парадигме у односу на механичку филозофију у контексту Њутновог (Isaac Newton) научног рада. Тенденција да се на алхемију гледа искључиво као на превазиђену фазу у развоју хемије већ дуже време трпи критике савремених историчара и филозофа науке, који такву тезу виде као исувише поједностављену, редукционистичку и аисторичну. У тексту представљам перспективу која критички приступа посматрању феномена алхемије искључиво кроз проблем демаркације,односно разликовања псеудонаучног и научног знања, будући да то може довести до неоправданог одбацивања или занемаривања целовитог сагледавања њеног значаја и улоге у различитим историјским контекстима. Кроз теоријску анализу и делимичан увид у Њутнов рад, у тексту се приказује историјско-филозофски контекст у коме је алхемија представљала парадигму у оквиру које су делале неке од кључних фигура за настанак модерне науке.
AB  - In this paper I want to examine the potential epistemological “advantages” of alchemy as a paradigm in relation to the mechanical philosophy in the context of the scientific work of Isaac Newton. The tendency to see alchemy exclusively as an outdated phase in the development of chemistry has long been criticized by modern historians and philosophers of science, who see such a thesis as too simplistic, reductionist and ahistorical. In the text, I present a perspective that critically approaches the observation of the phenomenon of alchemy exclusively through the problem of demarcation, ie distinguishing between pseudo-scientific and scientific knowledge, since it can lead to unjust rejection or neglect of a complete view of its significance and its roll through different historical contexts. Through theoretical analysis and limited insight into Newton’s work, the text presents the historical-philosophical context in which alchemy represented a paradigm within which some of the key figures for the emergence of modern science had worked.
PB  - Београд: Српска академија наука и уметности
PB  - Универзитет у Београду, Филозофски факултет
T2  - Филозофија и наука, Зборник радова
T1  - Алхемија као парадигма и фаза у развоју модерне науке
T1  - Alchemy as a paradigm and a phase in the development of modern science
EP  - 69
SP  - 59
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_1601
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Korolija, Maja",
year = "2022",
abstract = "У овом раду желим да испитам потенцијалне епистемолошке „предности” алхемије као парадигме у односу на механичку филозофију у контексту Њутновог (Isaac Newton) научног рада. Тенденција да се на алхемију гледа искључиво као на превазиђену фазу у развоју хемије већ дуже време трпи критике савремених историчара и филозофа науке, који такву тезу виде као исувише поједностављену, редукционистичку и аисторичну. У тексту представљам перспективу која критички приступа посматрању феномена алхемије искључиво кроз проблем демаркације,односно разликовања псеудонаучног и научног знања, будући да то може довести до неоправданог одбацивања или занемаривања целовитог сагледавања њеног значаја и улоге у различитим историјским контекстима. Кроз теоријску анализу и делимичан увид у Њутнов рад, у тексту се приказује историјско-филозофски контекст у коме је алхемија представљала парадигму у оквиру које су делале неке од кључних фигура за настанак модерне науке., In this paper I want to examine the potential epistemological “advantages” of alchemy as a paradigm in relation to the mechanical philosophy in the context of the scientific work of Isaac Newton. The tendency to see alchemy exclusively as an outdated phase in the development of chemistry has long been criticized by modern historians and philosophers of science, who see such a thesis as too simplistic, reductionist and ahistorical. In the text, I present a perspective that critically approaches the observation of the phenomenon of alchemy exclusively through the problem of demarcation, ie distinguishing between pseudo-scientific and scientific knowledge, since it can lead to unjust rejection or neglect of a complete view of its significance and its roll through different historical contexts. Through theoretical analysis and limited insight into Newton’s work, the text presents the historical-philosophical context in which alchemy represented a paradigm within which some of the key figures for the emergence of modern science had worked.",
publisher = "Београд: Српска академија наука и уметности, Универзитет у Београду, Филозофски факултет",
journal = "Филозофија и наука, Зборник радова",
booktitle = "Алхемија као парадигма и фаза у развоју модерне науке, Alchemy as a paradigm and a phase in the development of modern science",
pages = "69-59",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_1601"
}

Korolija, M.. (2022). Алхемија као парадигма и фаза у развоју модерне науке. in Филозофија и наука, Зборник радова
Београд: Српска академија наука и уметности., 59-69.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_1601

Korolija M. Алхемија као парадигма и фаза у развоју модерне науке. in Филозофија и наука, Зборник радова. 2022;:59-69.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_1601 .

Korolija, Maja, "Алхемија као парадигма и фаза у развоју модерне науке" in Филозофија и наука, Зборник радова (2022):59-69,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_1601 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Korolija, Maja
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rimsi.imsi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2349
AB  - Yugoslavia left the Eastern Bloc in 1948 to develop an autonomous political position in
South-Eastern Europe. The new Yugoslav system of socialist self-management combined
elements of workers’ self-government, controlled market relations, state decentralization and
Party control. Most of these elements revised or opposed the, until then dominant, ideology of
Marxism-Leninism. The Yugoslav system represented a heterodox form of socialism.
The author of this presentation will try to briefly describe the development of the Yugoslav
nuclear program in the socialist self-management society during the Cold War. The main focus
of the presentation will be tracking and analyzing changes in the organization and policy of
Yugoslav Nuclear program in the context of ideological changes in Yugoslavia. The key task of
the presentation is to examine the connection between relatively new ideological changes in
socioeconomic structure (decentralization and controlled market relations) with the organization
and policy of Yugoslav Nuclear Program. This will also require discussing the dynamics of
relations within Yugoslav state, its legislature and the development of nuclear physics in
Yugoslavia in general.
In order to fully and accurately analyze the relationship between the Yugoslav system and
nuclear science, the author will shortly present Yugoslav position in foreign relations after the
break with the USSR in this period (USA, USSR, Non-aligned movement).
PB  - The British Society for the History of Science
C3  - The  BSHS Postgraduate Conference
T1  - Ideology, Scientific Organisation, and Science Policy: Yugoslav Nuiclear Program (1948-1965)
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2349
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Korolija, Maja",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Yugoslavia left the Eastern Bloc in 1948 to develop an autonomous political position in
South-Eastern Europe. The new Yugoslav system of socialist self-management combined
elements of workers’ self-government, controlled market relations, state decentralization and
Party control. Most of these elements revised or opposed the, until then dominant, ideology of
Marxism-Leninism. The Yugoslav system represented a heterodox form of socialism.
The author of this presentation will try to briefly describe the development of the Yugoslav
nuclear program in the socialist self-management society during the Cold War. The main focus
of the presentation will be tracking and analyzing changes in the organization and policy of
Yugoslav Nuclear program in the context of ideological changes in Yugoslavia. The key task of
the presentation is to examine the connection between relatively new ideological changes in
socioeconomic structure (decentralization and controlled market relations) with the organization
and policy of Yugoslav Nuclear Program. This will also require discussing the dynamics of
relations within Yugoslav state, its legislature and the development of nuclear physics in
Yugoslavia in general.
In order to fully and accurately analyze the relationship between the Yugoslav system and
nuclear science, the author will shortly present Yugoslav position in foreign relations after the
break with the USSR in this period (USA, USSR, Non-aligned movement).",
publisher = "The British Society for the History of Science",
journal = "The  BSHS Postgraduate Conference",
title = "Ideology, Scientific Organisation, and Science Policy: Yugoslav Nuiclear Program (1948-1965)",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2349"
}

Korolija, M.. (2022). Ideology, Scientific Organisation, and Science Policy: Yugoslav Nuiclear Program (1948-1965). in The  BSHS Postgraduate Conference
The British Society for the History of Science..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2349

Korolija M. Ideology, Scientific Organisation, and Science Policy: Yugoslav Nuiclear Program (1948-1965). in The  BSHS Postgraduate Conference. 2022;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2349 .

Korolija, Maja, "Ideology, Scientific Organisation, and Science Policy: Yugoslav Nuiclear Program (1948-1965)" in The  BSHS Postgraduate Conference (2022),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2349 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Korolija, Maja
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rimsi.imsi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2347
AB  - The aim of this presentation is to briefly describe the development of the Yugoslav nuclear program in the socialist self-management society during the Cold War. Main focus will be placed on the dynamics of the relationship between state and science in Yugoslavia after the 1948 break with the USSR, which was until then perceived as an ideological leader to Yugoslavs. After this fall out, the USA saw Tito, Yugoslav president and Communist Party leader, as an ally and first dissident from the USSR, and thus decided to help Yugoslavia with food and arms. These international changes during the initial stages of the Cold War have reflected on Yugoslav ideology, its economy and state organization, and also contributed to the state's different perceptions of the role of science. The author of this presentation will try to discuss the dynamics of relations between state and scientists (physicists), as well as the importance of these relations for the Yugoslav nuclear program and the development of nuclear physics in Yugoslavia in general. Using a comparative method in order to fully and accurately analyze the relationship between the Yugoslav state and science, the author will contextualize it by exploring the relationship between science and the state in cases of the USA and USSR in this period.
PB  - Univerzite Libre de Bruxels
C3  - 10th Conference of the European Society for the History of Science, Book of Abstracts
T1  - State and Science: Yugoslav Nuclear Program (1948-1965)
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2347
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Korolija, Maja",
year = "2022",
abstract = "The aim of this presentation is to briefly describe the development of the Yugoslav nuclear program in the socialist self-management society during the Cold War. Main focus will be placed on the dynamics of the relationship between state and science in Yugoslavia after the 1948 break with the USSR, which was until then perceived as an ideological leader to Yugoslavs. After this fall out, the USA saw Tito, Yugoslav president and Communist Party leader, as an ally and first dissident from the USSR, and thus decided to help Yugoslavia with food and arms. These international changes during the initial stages of the Cold War have reflected on Yugoslav ideology, its economy and state organization, and also contributed to the state's different perceptions of the role of science. The author of this presentation will try to discuss the dynamics of relations between state and scientists (physicists), as well as the importance of these relations for the Yugoslav nuclear program and the development of nuclear physics in Yugoslavia in general. Using a comparative method in order to fully and accurately analyze the relationship between the Yugoslav state and science, the author will contextualize it by exploring the relationship between science and the state in cases of the USA and USSR in this period.",
publisher = "Univerzite Libre de Bruxels",
journal = "10th Conference of the European Society for the History of Science, Book of Abstracts",
title = "State and Science: Yugoslav Nuclear Program (1948-1965)",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2347"
}

Korolija, M.. (2022). State and Science: Yugoslav Nuclear Program (1948-1965). in 10th Conference of the European Society for the History of Science, Book of Abstracts
Univerzite Libre de Bruxels..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2347

Korolija M. State and Science: Yugoslav Nuclear Program (1948-1965). in 10th Conference of the European Society for the History of Science, Book of Abstracts. 2022;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2347 .

Korolija, Maja, "State and Science: Yugoslav Nuclear Program (1948-1965)" in 10th Conference of the European Society for the History of Science, Book of Abstracts (2022),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2347 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Korolija, Maja
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rimsi.imsi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2345
AB  - In this presentation I examine the changes in Yugoslavian science after the radical political and
ideological turn that followed the break with the USSR since 1948. Prior to the split, the
scientific discourse in Yugoslavia was critical of ‘reactionary’ ‘capitalist science’, and the
scientific practice was placed in the framework of Marxism-Leninism. This framework assumed
that the science should be as close as possible to the concrete realities of the socialist society.
The basic theoretical premise of this framework was "partisanship", which saw science, as all
other spheres of human activities, as a field of ideological struggle. The preferred model of
scientific organization was almost identical to the one from the USSR. This meant that the
science was developed in the context of the planned economy and with centralizing tendencies.

After the break with the USSR, however, Yugoslavian science policy took a different turn: it was
increasingly characterized by decentralization in the organization and the introduction of the
concept of autonomous science. I argue that those developments reflected the introduction of the
limited market economy in FPRY, that followed the break with USSR and its economic and
political model. The nature of changes in the organization of science in the FPRY could shed
light on the relationship between political ideology and science in general.
PB  - The British Society for the History of Science
C3  - British Society for the History of Science Postgraduate Conference
T1  - Effects of the Cold War on the Science in Yugoslavia (1945-1963)
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2345
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Korolija, Maja",
year = "2021",
abstract = "In this presentation I examine the changes in Yugoslavian science after the radical political and
ideological turn that followed the break with the USSR since 1948. Prior to the split, the
scientific discourse in Yugoslavia was critical of ‘reactionary’ ‘capitalist science’, and the
scientific practice was placed in the framework of Marxism-Leninism. This framework assumed
that the science should be as close as possible to the concrete realities of the socialist society.
The basic theoretical premise of this framework was "partisanship", which saw science, as all
other spheres of human activities, as a field of ideological struggle. The preferred model of
scientific organization was almost identical to the one from the USSR. This meant that the
science was developed in the context of the planned economy and with centralizing tendencies.

After the break with the USSR, however, Yugoslavian science policy took a different turn: it was
increasingly characterized by decentralization in the organization and the introduction of the
concept of autonomous science. I argue that those developments reflected the introduction of the
limited market economy in FPRY, that followed the break with USSR and its economic and
political model. The nature of changes in the organization of science in the FPRY could shed
light on the relationship between political ideology and science in general.",
publisher = "The British Society for the History of Science",
journal = "British Society for the History of Science Postgraduate Conference",
title = "Effects of the Cold War on the Science in Yugoslavia (1945-1963)",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2345"
}

Korolija, M.. (2021). Effects of the Cold War on the Science in Yugoslavia (1945-1963). in British Society for the History of Science Postgraduate Conference
The British Society for the History of Science..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2345

Korolija M. Effects of the Cold War on the Science in Yugoslavia (1945-1963). in British Society for the History of Science Postgraduate Conference. 2021;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2345 .

Korolija, Maja, "Effects of the Cold War on the Science in Yugoslavia (1945-1963)" in British Society for the History of Science Postgraduate Conference (2021),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2345 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Korolija, Maja
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rimsi.imsi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2352
AB  - Analysis of the relationship between science and political ideology during the Cold War
period rises many important questions regarding the history and philosophy of science: How
different ideologies understand the role of science in the society? Is every political ideology a
potential enemy of scientific principles? Is autonomous science possible? In which ideological
system science can achieve its full potentials?
Aim of this presentation is to try to shed additional light on the dynamics of this relationship,
focusing on two opposite visions of science: partisanship in science and autonomy of science, and
its interaction with socio-economic system of Federal People's Republic Yugoslavia.
The changes that occurred in the FPR Yugoslavia after its break with the Soviet Union in 1948 had
also impacted the field of science. Until then, in accordance with Marxist-Leninist ideological
positions, partisanship in science was dominant epistemological paradigm in Yugoslav scientific
community. That meant that the science was also perceived as a field of ideological struggle, and
that scientists were expected to clearly position themselves on the side of "the people" in their
activities.
After the break with the USSR, the ideology of Marxism-Leninism in Yugoslavia gave way to the
Self-managed socialism. Such tendencies represent the Yugoslav ideological departure from the
ideas of Marxism-Leninism and, on a practical level, orientation towards the scientific
cooperation with the countries of the Western Bloc. In this way, the scientific discourse in
Yugoslavia, though it remained permeated with Marxist elements, which cohabited with "new"
essentially anti-Leninist theses (such as the idea of the independence of scientific work), gave
way to a specific philosophical perspective that implied the autonomy of science.
PB  - National Hellenistic Research Foundation
C3  - 2nd Early Career Scholars Conference, Science and its Enemies: Exploring Conflicts and Alliances in the History of Science
T1  - Tito’s Science Between Partisanship and Autonomy (1945-1963)
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2352
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Korolija, Maja",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Analysis of the relationship between science and political ideology during the Cold War
period rises many important questions regarding the history and philosophy of science: How
different ideologies understand the role of science in the society? Is every political ideology a
potential enemy of scientific principles? Is autonomous science possible? In which ideological
system science can achieve its full potentials?
Aim of this presentation is to try to shed additional light on the dynamics of this relationship,
focusing on two opposite visions of science: partisanship in science and autonomy of science, and
its interaction with socio-economic system of Federal People's Republic Yugoslavia.
The changes that occurred in the FPR Yugoslavia after its break with the Soviet Union in 1948 had
also impacted the field of science. Until then, in accordance with Marxist-Leninist ideological
positions, partisanship in science was dominant epistemological paradigm in Yugoslav scientific
community. That meant that the science was also perceived as a field of ideological struggle, and
that scientists were expected to clearly position themselves on the side of "the people" in their
activities.
After the break with the USSR, the ideology of Marxism-Leninism in Yugoslavia gave way to the
Self-managed socialism. Such tendencies represent the Yugoslav ideological departure from the
ideas of Marxism-Leninism and, on a practical level, orientation towards the scientific
cooperation with the countries of the Western Bloc. In this way, the scientific discourse in
Yugoslavia, though it remained permeated with Marxist elements, which cohabited with "new"
essentially anti-Leninist theses (such as the idea of the independence of scientific work), gave
way to a specific philosophical perspective that implied the autonomy of science.",
publisher = "National Hellenistic Research Foundation",
journal = "2nd Early Career Scholars Conference, Science and its Enemies: Exploring Conflicts and Alliances in the History of Science",
title = "Tito’s Science Between Partisanship and Autonomy (1945-1963)",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2352"
}

Korolija, M.. (2021). Tito’s Science Between Partisanship and Autonomy (1945-1963). in 2nd Early Career Scholars Conference, Science and its Enemies: Exploring Conflicts and Alliances in the History of Science
National Hellenistic Research Foundation..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2352

Korolija M. Tito’s Science Between Partisanship and Autonomy (1945-1963). in 2nd Early Career Scholars Conference, Science and its Enemies: Exploring Conflicts and Alliances in the History of Science. 2021;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2352 .

Korolija, Maja, "Tito’s Science Between Partisanship and Autonomy (1945-1963)" in 2nd Early Career Scholars Conference, Science and its Enemies: Exploring Conflicts and Alliances in the History of Science (2021),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2352 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Korolija, Maja
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rimsi.imsi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1602
AB  - MI5, the Cold War, and the Rule of Law (1945–64) embarks on its analysis from the legal perspective (questions of authority, power and accountability) and the tradition of civil liberties. The material examined in the book includes security files at The National Archives which were hitherto unavailable to scholars coming from this tradition. What this book ultimately suggests is that even thoroughly criticized reading of the classical concept of the rule of law (Dicey) theoretically provides more protection for the civil liberties as compared to the system in which MI5 operated.
PB  - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
T2  - The British Journal for the History of Science
T1  - Keith Ewing, Joan Mahoney and Andrew Moretta, MI5, the Cold War, and the Rule of Law Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
EP  - 536
IS  - 4
SP  - 534
VL  - 54
DO  - 10.1017/s0007087421000765
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Korolija, Maja",
year = "2021",
abstract = "MI5, the Cold War, and the Rule of Law (1945–64) embarks on its analysis from the legal perspective (questions of authority, power and accountability) and the tradition of civil liberties. The material examined in the book includes security files at The National Archives which were hitherto unavailable to scholars coming from this tradition. What this book ultimately suggests is that even thoroughly criticized reading of the classical concept of the rule of law (Dicey) theoretically provides more protection for the civil liberties as compared to the system in which MI5 operated.",
publisher = "Cambridge: Cambridge University Press",
journal = "The British Journal for the History of Science",
title = "Keith Ewing, Joan Mahoney and Andrew Moretta, MI5, the Cold War, and the Rule of Law Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.",
pages = "536-534",
number = "4",
volume = "54",
doi = "10.1017/s0007087421000765"
}

Korolija, M.. (2021). Keith Ewing, Joan Mahoney and Andrew Moretta, MI5, the Cold War, and the Rule of Law Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.. in The British Journal for the History of Science
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., 54(4), 534-536.
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007087421000765

Korolija M. Keith Ewing, Joan Mahoney and Andrew Moretta, MI5, the Cold War, and the Rule of Law Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.. in The British Journal for the History of Science. 2021;54(4):534-536.
doi:10.1017/s0007087421000765 .

Korolija, Maja, "Keith Ewing, Joan Mahoney and Andrew Moretta, MI5, the Cold War, and the Rule of Law Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020." in The British Journal for the History of Science, 54, no. 4 (2021):534-536,
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007087421000765 . .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Korolija, Maja
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rimsi.imsi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2351
AB  - As a result of acknowledging the social importance of science, inherent to the
Marxist-Leninist ideology, in the aftermath of the WWII the process of
accelerated scientific development was initiated in Yugoslavia with the assistance of
the USSR. The Yugoslav communists relied on the USSR, and therefore the
Soviet science model was one they opted for. However, in 1948. Yugoslavia
broke away from the Eastern bloc led by the Soviet Union. The Communist Party
of Yugoslavia (CPY) was excluded from the Information Bureau of the Communist
and Workers' Parties (Cominform), charged with reintroducing capitalism and
displaying nationalist tendencies. Prior to this, and in line with the practice in
the USSR, the scientific discourse in Yugoslavia was critical of the scientific
practice in the West, which was labeled idealist, positivist, historicist, bourgeois,
etc. The scientific practice in Yugoslavia was placed in the framework of
historical and dialectical materialism, Marxism-Leninism, which postulated that the
science should grow from and be as close as possible to the concrete realities of
the Yugoslav society. The basic feature of this practice was "partisanship", which
meant that science, as all other spheres of human activities, is also a field of
ideological struggle. Edvard Kardelj, one of the main ideologists of the CPY,
delivered a speech in 1949, at the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, which
stood as the first explicit critique of the Soviet model of science by the Yugoslav
communists. In this speech, the USSR was accused of anti-scientific tendencies,
of making the science an "unprincipled layman of practical bureaucracy" (which is
how he saw the partisanship in science); instead, the science, according to
the new Yugoslav ideology, should serve the "truth" and "prosperity", while the
scientists in Yugoslavia should be "free in their creation." The promotion of the
sovereignty of science and the criticism of "partisanship" by the Yugoslav
communists runs counter to the Marxist-Leninist understanding of the role of
science. That speech clarified ideological shift that was taking off, and laid the
ideological foundations for the new scientific practice in Yugoslavia. One which will
encompass liberal elements and would, thus, correspond more to the new political
system in Yugoslavia – the so-called self-managed socialism. It is my intention to
examine the line of argument in social sciences that emerged as a result of this
ideological shift, and which provided the new system in Yugoslavia with the
ideological framework for new practices, including the ones in the field of the
organization of science. I will analyze the nature of the evidence present in the
official ideology discourse of the direction that Yugoslav society has taken in the
period before and after the split with the USSR, as well as try to examine, in that
context, the issues of the relationship between political ideology and (social) science.
PB  - Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
C3  - Practicing Evidence - Evidencing Practice
T1  - Scientific Practice in Yugoslavia: From Marxism-Leninism to Self-Managed Socialism
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2351
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Korolija, Maja",
year = "2020",
abstract = "As a result of acknowledging the social importance of science, inherent to the
Marxist-Leninist ideology, in the aftermath of the WWII the process of
accelerated scientific development was initiated in Yugoslavia with the assistance of
the USSR. The Yugoslav communists relied on the USSR, and therefore the
Soviet science model was one they opted for. However, in 1948. Yugoslavia
broke away from the Eastern bloc led by the Soviet Union. The Communist Party
of Yugoslavia (CPY) was excluded from the Information Bureau of the Communist
and Workers' Parties (Cominform), charged with reintroducing capitalism and
displaying nationalist tendencies. Prior to this, and in line with the practice in
the USSR, the scientific discourse in Yugoslavia was critical of the scientific
practice in the West, which was labeled idealist, positivist, historicist, bourgeois,
etc. The scientific practice in Yugoslavia was placed in the framework of
historical and dialectical materialism, Marxism-Leninism, which postulated that the
science should grow from and be as close as possible to the concrete realities of
the Yugoslav society. The basic feature of this practice was "partisanship", which
meant that science, as all other spheres of human activities, is also a field of
ideological struggle. Edvard Kardelj, one of the main ideologists of the CPY,
delivered a speech in 1949, at the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, which
stood as the first explicit critique of the Soviet model of science by the Yugoslav
communists. In this speech, the USSR was accused of anti-scientific tendencies,
of making the science an "unprincipled layman of practical bureaucracy" (which is
how he saw the partisanship in science); instead, the science, according to
the new Yugoslav ideology, should serve the "truth" and "prosperity", while the
scientists in Yugoslavia should be "free in their creation." The promotion of the
sovereignty of science and the criticism of "partisanship" by the Yugoslav
communists runs counter to the Marxist-Leninist understanding of the role of
science. That speech clarified ideological shift that was taking off, and laid the
ideological foundations for the new scientific practice in Yugoslavia. One which will
encompass liberal elements and would, thus, correspond more to the new political
system in Yugoslavia – the so-called self-managed socialism. It is my intention to
examine the line of argument in social sciences that emerged as a result of this
ideological shift, and which provided the new system in Yugoslavia with the
ideological framework for new practices, including the ones in the field of the
organization of science. I will analyze the nature of the evidence present in the
official ideology discourse of the direction that Yugoslav society has taken in the
period before and after the split with the USSR, as well as try to examine, in that
context, the issues of the relationship between political ideology and (social) science.",
publisher = "Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft",
journal = "Practicing Evidence - Evidencing Practice",
title = "Scientific Practice in Yugoslavia: From Marxism-Leninism to Self-Managed Socialism",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2351"
}

Korolija, M.. (2020). Scientific Practice in Yugoslavia: From Marxism-Leninism to Self-Managed Socialism. in Practicing Evidence - Evidencing Practice
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2351

Korolija M. Scientific Practice in Yugoslavia: From Marxism-Leninism to Self-Managed Socialism. in Practicing Evidence - Evidencing Practice. 2020;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2351 .

Korolija, Maja, "Scientific Practice in Yugoslavia: From Marxism-Leninism to Self-Managed Socialism" in Practicing Evidence - Evidencing Practice (2020),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2351 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Korolija, Maja
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rimsi.imsi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2346
AB  - In 1948, during the turbulent period of the Cold War, an international crisis occurred during which the Federative People’s Republic of Yugoslavia (FPRY), under the leadership of Josip Broz Tito, left the USSR controlled Eastern bloc. Changes that occurred in the FPRY after the break with the Soviet Union have reflected on all social spheres, including the sphere of science. Prior to the split, Yugoslavian scientific authorities, adopting a Marxist-Leninist position, criticized capitalist science as idealist and reactionary. They insisted that the scientific practice and its results should be as close as possible to the concrete realities of the socialist society. The key concept summarizing this position was “partisanship” that saw science, as all other spheres of human activities, as a field of ideological struggle. The preferred model of scientific organization was almost identical to the one in the USSR: science was to follow the planned economy of a centralized state. After the break with the USSR, we detect opposite dynamics in Yugoslavia: process of the decentralization in the organization of science (and society) and the introduction of an “autonomous” science in the official political vocabulary. 

In this paper, I argue that the change towards a more liberal reading of scientific practice reflected the introduction of the limited market in FPRY that gradually developed following the break with USSR. I also suggest that this shift could help identify new general relationships between politics and science in the context of Yugoslavian science. And this could help us understand what the concepts of “partisanship” and “autonomy” of science really meant in practice.
PB  - Centre for the History of Science, Technology and Medicine (University of Manchester)
C3  - Lunchtime Seminars: PhD students at the Centre for the History of Science, Technology and Medicine (University of Manchester)
T1  - Tito’s Science: Socialist Science on the Market Trajectory
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2346
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Korolija, Maja",
year = "2020",
abstract = "In 1948, during the turbulent period of the Cold War, an international crisis occurred during which the Federative People’s Republic of Yugoslavia (FPRY), under the leadership of Josip Broz Tito, left the USSR controlled Eastern bloc. Changes that occurred in the FPRY after the break with the Soviet Union have reflected on all social spheres, including the sphere of science. Prior to the split, Yugoslavian scientific authorities, adopting a Marxist-Leninist position, criticized capitalist science as idealist and reactionary. They insisted that the scientific practice and its results should be as close as possible to the concrete realities of the socialist society. The key concept summarizing this position was “partisanship” that saw science, as all other spheres of human activities, as a field of ideological struggle. The preferred model of scientific organization was almost identical to the one in the USSR: science was to follow the planned economy of a centralized state. After the break with the USSR, we detect opposite dynamics in Yugoslavia: process of the decentralization in the organization of science (and society) and the introduction of an “autonomous” science in the official political vocabulary. 

In this paper, I argue that the change towards a more liberal reading of scientific practice reflected the introduction of the limited market in FPRY that gradually developed following the break with USSR. I also suggest that this shift could help identify new general relationships between politics and science in the context of Yugoslavian science. And this could help us understand what the concepts of “partisanship” and “autonomy” of science really meant in practice.",
publisher = "Centre for the History of Science, Technology and Medicine (University of Manchester)",
journal = "Lunchtime Seminars: PhD students at the Centre for the History of Science, Technology and Medicine (University of Manchester)",
title = "Tito’s Science: Socialist Science on the Market Trajectory",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2346"
}

Korolija, M.. (2020). Tito’s Science: Socialist Science on the Market Trajectory. in Lunchtime Seminars: PhD students at the Centre for the History of Science, Technology and Medicine (University of Manchester)
Centre for the History of Science, Technology and Medicine (University of Manchester)..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2346

Korolija M. Tito’s Science: Socialist Science on the Market Trajectory. in Lunchtime Seminars: PhD students at the Centre for the History of Science, Technology and Medicine (University of Manchester). 2020;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2346 .

Korolija, Maja, "Tito’s Science: Socialist Science on the Market Trajectory" in Lunchtime Seminars: PhD students at the Centre for the History of Science, Technology and Medicine (University of Manchester) (2020),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2346 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Korolija, Maja
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rimsi.imsi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2331
AB  - Тенденција да се на алхемију гледа искључиво као на превазиђену фазу у развоју хемије већ дуже време трпи критике савремених историчара и филозофа науке,
који такву тезу виде као исувише поједностављену, редукционистичку и аисторичну.
Проблем је у томе што посматрање алхемије искључиво кроз проблем демаркације,
односно разликовања псеудонаучног и научног знања, може довести до неправедног
одбацивања или занемаривања сагледавања значаја и улоге алхемије кроз различите
историјске контексте. У одређеним контекстима алхемија је представљала једну од грана
природне филозофије, парадигму у којој су делале неке од кључних фигура у настанку
модерне науке, попут Исака Њутна, а не само протонауку у облаку мистицизма итд.
Њутн је у својим делима и истраживањима полазио примарно из идеалистичке
односно алхемијеске парадигме. Намера мог излагања је да кроз (ограничене) увиде
у рад Исака Њутна истражи потенцијалне епистемолошке „предности” алхемије као
парадигме у контексту научног рада, у односу на механичку филозофију тог периода.
У херменеутичком смислу може бити плодно сагледати епистемолошку корисност
елемената тадашње алхемијске парадигме у контексту промена које су у модерну научну
парадигму ушле захваљујући истраживањима из различитих научних области, као што
је микрофизика нпр. (Башлар).
AB  - Tendency to view alchemy only as an obsolete phase in the development of chemistry has been criticized for some time by contemporary historians and philosophers of science, who view such thesis as one that is too simplified, reductionist and ahistorical. The problem is that examining alchemy only through problem of demarcation, i.e. distinguish between pseudo-scientific and scientific knowledge, could lead to unjust rejection or neglect in perceiving of importance and role the alchemy had in different historical contexts. In certain contexts alchemy was not only a protoscience in the cloud of mysticism, but one of the branches of natural philosophy, paradigm in which some of the key figures in the creation of modern science were operating, such as Isaac Newton. In his research and works Newton primarily started from idealistic, that is alchemist paradigm. The intention of my presentation is to, through limited insight in the work of Issac Newton, research potential epistemological “advantages” of alchemy as paradigm in the context of scientific work, in relation to mechanical philosophy of that period. In hermeneutical sense it could be fruitful to observe epistemological usefulness of alchemy paradigm of that time in the context of changes that entered modern scientific paradigm due to research in different scientific fields, such as microphysics. (Bachelard)
PB  - Српска академија наука и уметности
PB  - Одељење за филозофију Филозофског факултета Универзитета у Београду
C3  - Научни скуп: Филозофија и наука
T1  - Alhemija kao paradigma i faza u razvoju moderne nauke
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2331
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Korolija, Maja",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Тенденција да се на алхемију гледа искључиво као на превазиђену фазу у развоју хемије већ дуже време трпи критике савремених историчара и филозофа науке,
који такву тезу виде као исувише поједностављену, редукционистичку и аисторичну.
Проблем је у томе што посматрање алхемије искључиво кроз проблем демаркације,
односно разликовања псеудонаучног и научног знања, може довести до неправедног
одбацивања или занемаривања сагледавања значаја и улоге алхемије кроз различите
историјске контексте. У одређеним контекстима алхемија је представљала једну од грана
природне филозофије, парадигму у којој су делале неке од кључних фигура у настанку
модерне науке, попут Исака Њутна, а не само протонауку у облаку мистицизма итд.
Њутн је у својим делима и истраживањима полазио примарно из идеалистичке
односно алхемијеске парадигме. Намера мог излагања је да кроз (ограничене) увиде
у рад Исака Њутна истражи потенцијалне епистемолошке „предности” алхемије као
парадигме у контексту научног рада, у односу на механичку филозофију тог периода.
У херменеутичком смислу може бити плодно сагледати епистемолошку корисност
елемената тадашње алхемијске парадигме у контексту промена које су у модерну научну
парадигму ушле захваљујући истраживањима из различитих научних области, као што
је микрофизика нпр. (Башлар)., Tendency to view alchemy only as an obsolete phase in the development of chemistry has been criticized for some time by contemporary historians and philosophers of science, who view such thesis as one that is too simplified, reductionist and ahistorical. The problem is that examining alchemy only through problem of demarcation, i.e. distinguish between pseudo-scientific and scientific knowledge, could lead to unjust rejection or neglect in perceiving of importance and role the alchemy had in different historical contexts. In certain contexts alchemy was not only a protoscience in the cloud of mysticism, but one of the branches of natural philosophy, paradigm in which some of the key figures in the creation of modern science were operating, such as Isaac Newton. In his research and works Newton primarily started from idealistic, that is alchemist paradigm. The intention of my presentation is to, through limited insight in the work of Issac Newton, research potential epistemological “advantages” of alchemy as paradigm in the context of scientific work, in relation to mechanical philosophy of that period. In hermeneutical sense it could be fruitful to observe epistemological usefulness of alchemy paradigm of that time in the context of changes that entered modern scientific paradigm due to research in different scientific fields, such as microphysics. (Bachelard)",
publisher = "Српска академија наука и уметности, Одељење за филозофију Филозофског факултета Универзитета у Београду",
journal = "Научни скуп: Филозофија и наука",
title = "Alhemija kao paradigma i faza u razvoju moderne nauke",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2331"
}

Korolija, M.. (2020). Alhemija kao paradigma i faza u razvoju moderne nauke. in Научни скуп: Филозофија и наука
Српска академија наука и уметности..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2331

Korolija M. Alhemija kao paradigma i faza u razvoju moderne nauke. in Научни скуп: Филозофија и наука. 2020;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2331 .

Korolija, Maja, "Alhemija kao paradigma i faza u razvoju moderne nauke" in Научни скуп: Филозофија и наука (2020),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2331 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Korolija, Maja
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rimsi.imsi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1593
AB  - Through this paper, it is the author’s intention to present Merton’s (Robert King Merton) scientific norms (CUDOS), which the author finds to be representative of the positivist framework of ideal-type science activity, in the perspective of the Marxist critique of positivism. Using the dialectical method, the author also analyzes the role of science in society from a Marxist perspective, while presenting the Marxist critique of the basic elements of positivist methodology. This is important in order to better examine and to show what are the similarities and what are the differences in the interpretation and application of the scientific ethos, as well as the role of science in society in the positivist and Marxist paradigms. In the conclusion, the author shows how these differences manifest themselves in terms of the relationship of the science to the dominant political ideology and social relations.
AB  - Намера аутора је да се из перспективе марксистичке критике позитивизма,користећи дијалектички метод, осветле Мертонове (Роберт Kинг Мертон) научне норме („КУДОС“), које налази као репрезентативне за позитивистички оквир идеално-типске научне делатности, што се експлицира у самом Уводу рада. У поглављу Марксистичка критика позитивизма аутор указује на елементе који према марксистичкој перспективи представљају недостатке позитивизма као истраживачке филозофије, као и на непремостиви раскол, који из те перспективе постоји између пожељних научних норми и капиталистичког поретка. У поглављу Мертонове норме разматране у светлу марксизма аутор показује да је Мертонов примарни фокус усмерен на питање на који начин је могуће побољшати интеграцију научних резултата и професије научника у постојећи друштвени систем не угрожавајући неке од основних научних принципа. Он решење проналази у друштвено-економским реформама грађанског поретка, што марксистичка перспектива критикује као утопизам. У Закључку рада аутор сумира сличности и разлике у тумачењу и примени научног етоса у позитивистичкој и у марксистичкој парадигми, те како се оне манифестују и у погледу перспективе односа науке према владајућој политичкој идеологији и друштвеним односима.
PB  - Udruženje "Nauka i društvo"
T2  - Nauka i društvo
T1  - Science and Society: Merton's scientific norms in the light of the Marxist critique of positivism
T1  - Наука и друштво: Мертонове научне норме у светлу марксистичке критике позитивизма
EP  - 82
IS  - 12
SP  - 60
VL  - 2
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_1593
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Korolija, Maja",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Through this paper, it is the author’s intention to present Merton’s (Robert King Merton) scientific norms (CUDOS), which the author finds to be representative of the positivist framework of ideal-type science activity, in the perspective of the Marxist critique of positivism. Using the dialectical method, the author also analyzes the role of science in society from a Marxist perspective, while presenting the Marxist critique of the basic elements of positivist methodology. This is important in order to better examine and to show what are the similarities and what are the differences in the interpretation and application of the scientific ethos, as well as the role of science in society in the positivist and Marxist paradigms. In the conclusion, the author shows how these differences manifest themselves in terms of the relationship of the science to the dominant political ideology and social relations., Намера аутора је да се из перспективе марксистичке критике позитивизма,користећи дијалектички метод, осветле Мертонове (Роберт Kинг Мертон) научне норме („КУДОС“), које налази као репрезентативне за позитивистички оквир идеално-типске научне делатности, што се експлицира у самом Уводу рада. У поглављу Марксистичка критика позитивизма аутор указује на елементе који према марксистичкој перспективи представљају недостатке позитивизма као истраживачке филозофије, као и на непремостиви раскол, који из те перспективе постоји између пожељних научних норми и капиталистичког поретка. У поглављу Мертонове норме разматране у светлу марксизма аутор показује да је Мертонов примарни фокус усмерен на питање на који начин је могуће побољшати интеграцију научних резултата и професије научника у постојећи друштвени систем не угрожавајући неке од основних научних принципа. Он решење проналази у друштвено-економским реформама грађанског поретка, што марксистичка перспектива критикује као утопизам. У Закључку рада аутор сумира сличности и разлике у тумачењу и примени научног етоса у позитивистичкој и у марксистичкој парадигми, те како се оне манифестују и у погледу перспективе односа науке према владајућој политичкој идеологији и друштвеним односима.",
publisher = "Udruženje "Nauka i društvo"",
journal = "Nauka i društvo",
title = "Science and Society: Merton's scientific norms in the light of the Marxist critique of positivism, Наука и друштво: Мертонове научне норме у светлу марксистичке критике позитивизма",
pages = "82-60",
number = "12",
volume = "2",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_1593"
}

Korolija, M.. (2020). Science and Society: Merton's scientific norms in the light of the Marxist critique of positivism. in Nauka i društvo
Udruženje "Nauka i društvo"., 2(12), 60-82.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_1593

Korolija M. Science and Society: Merton's scientific norms in the light of the Marxist critique of positivism. in Nauka i društvo. 2020;2(12):60-82.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_1593 .

Korolija, Maja, "Science and Society: Merton's scientific norms in the light of the Marxist critique of positivism" in Nauka i društvo, 2, no. 12 (2020):60-82,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_1593 .

Korolija, M.. (2019). Rodna analiza nastavnih programa i udžbenika za srpski jezik od prvog do četvrtog razreda osnovne škole. 
Tim za socijalno uključivanjе i smanjеnjе siromaštva Vladе Rеpublikе Srbijе..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2817

Korolija M. Rodna analiza nastavnih programa i udžbenika za srpski jezik od prvog do četvrtog razreda osnovne škole. 2019;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2817 .

Korolija, Maja, "Rodna analiza nastavnih programa i udžbenika za srpski jezik od prvog do četvrtog razreda osnovne škole" (2019),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2817 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Korolija, Maja
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rimsi.imsi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1603
AB  - Zuckert tends to settle some of the interpretative quandaries in academia regarding Machiavelli’s writings. The main problem in that field is the perceived incoherence of his quite diverse work. Zuckert tries to show how narrative methods used in many of them are related. In his historical and political works Machiavelli takes one position,then examines its critiques and alternatives, after which he comes to a provisional conclusion which he then subjects to critique. In his fictional writings,Machiavelli presents diferent characters with diferent understandings of what is important and how something should be done in order to get good results, and then he shows which of those characters succeeds, and which fails, and why. Zuckert notes that in all of Machiavelli’s works human beings are acting on the bases of their fears, hopes and passions. Machiavelli also thinks that, in their tendencies to satisfy their needs, people would end up in violent conflicts without some form of government. Zuckert is trying to show that the principles praised in his works, taken together as well as individually, present a coherent whole.
PB  - Belgrade: Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Catherine Zuckert, Machiavelli’s Politics, University Of Chicago Press, Chicago & London, 2017
EP  - 635
IS  - 30
SP  - 633
VL  - 4
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_1603
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Korolija, Maja",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Zuckert tends to settle some of the interpretative quandaries in academia regarding Machiavelli’s writings. The main problem in that field is the perceived incoherence of his quite diverse work. Zuckert tries to show how narrative methods used in many of them are related. In his historical and political works Machiavelli takes one position,then examines its critiques and alternatives, after which he comes to a provisional conclusion which he then subjects to critique. In his fictional writings,Machiavelli presents diferent characters with diferent understandings of what is important and how something should be done in order to get good results, and then he shows which of those characters succeeds, and which fails, and why. Zuckert notes that in all of Machiavelli’s works human beings are acting on the bases of their fears, hopes and passions. Machiavelli also thinks that, in their tendencies to satisfy their needs, people would end up in violent conflicts without some form of government. Zuckert is trying to show that the principles praised in his works, taken together as well as individually, present a coherent whole.",
publisher = "Belgrade: Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Catherine Zuckert, Machiavelli’s Politics, University Of Chicago Press, Chicago & London, 2017",
pages = "635-633",
number = "30",
volume = "4",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_1603"
}

Korolija, M.. (2019). Catherine Zuckert, Machiavelli’s Politics, University Of Chicago Press, Chicago & London, 2017. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Belgrade: Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory., 4(30), 633-635.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_1603

Korolija M. Catherine Zuckert, Machiavelli’s Politics, University Of Chicago Press, Chicago & London, 2017. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2019;4(30):633-635.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_1603 .

Korolija, Maja, "Catherine Zuckert, Machiavelli’s Politics, University Of Chicago Press, Chicago & London, 2017" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 4, no. 30 (2019):633-635,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_1603 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Korolija, Maja
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rimsi.imsi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2348
AB  - Promene koje su usledile u Federativnoj Narodnoj Republici Jugoslaviji nakon raskida sa Sovjetskim Savezom 1948. godine odrazile su se na sve društvene sfere, uključujući i sferu nauke. Namera ovog rada je da ispita prirodu promena u nauci Jugoslavije u kontekstu hladnog rata. Posebna pažnja će biti posvećena procesu decentralizacije u organizaciji nauke, uvođenju koncepta suverene nauke i efekte koje na nauku ima uvođenje ograničenog tržišta u Jugoslaviju.

Predmet rada je analiza odnosa nauke i političke ideologije na primeru istorije saradnje FNRJ i SSSR, te praktičnih posledica prekida te saradnje 1948. godine na obrazovni i naučni sistem FNRJ, konkretno nuklearnu fiziku, sa osvrtom na ekonomsko-političku transformaciju u kontekstu hladnog rata.

Ovo ujedno predstavlja i ispitivanje jugoslovenskog doprinosa pretpostavkama za nastanak fenomena koji bi se mogao označiti kao nesvrstana nauka odnosno nauka oblikovana u periodu duboke podele sveta na Istočni i Zapadni blok, u državama koje su se borile za nezavisnost, formirajući kasnije Pokret nesvrstanih.
PB  - Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Novom Sadu
C3  - Peti međunarodni interdisciplinarni skup društvenih i humanističkih nauka Konteksti
T1  - Hladni rat u nauci Jugoslavije: odnos nauke i političke ideologije u FNRJ
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2348
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Korolija, Maja",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Promene koje su usledile u Federativnoj Narodnoj Republici Jugoslaviji nakon raskida sa Sovjetskim Savezom 1948. godine odrazile su se na sve društvene sfere, uključujući i sferu nauke. Namera ovog rada je da ispita prirodu promena u nauci Jugoslavije u kontekstu hladnog rata. Posebna pažnja će biti posvećena procesu decentralizacije u organizaciji nauke, uvođenju koncepta suverene nauke i efekte koje na nauku ima uvođenje ograničenog tržišta u Jugoslaviju.

Predmet rada je analiza odnosa nauke i političke ideologije na primeru istorije saradnje FNRJ i SSSR, te praktičnih posledica prekida te saradnje 1948. godine na obrazovni i naučni sistem FNRJ, konkretno nuklearnu fiziku, sa osvrtom na ekonomsko-političku transformaciju u kontekstu hladnog rata.

Ovo ujedno predstavlja i ispitivanje jugoslovenskog doprinosa pretpostavkama za nastanak fenomena koji bi se mogao označiti kao nesvrstana nauka odnosno nauka oblikovana u periodu duboke podele sveta na Istočni i Zapadni blok, u državama koje su se borile za nezavisnost, formirajući kasnije Pokret nesvrstanih.",
publisher = "Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Novom Sadu",
journal = "Peti međunarodni interdisciplinarni skup društvenih i humanističkih nauka Konteksti",
title = "Hladni rat u nauci Jugoslavije: odnos nauke i političke ideologije u FNRJ",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2348"
}

Korolija, M.. (2019). Hladni rat u nauci Jugoslavije: odnos nauke i političke ideologije u FNRJ. in Peti međunarodni interdisciplinarni skup društvenih i humanističkih nauka Konteksti
Filozofski fakultet, Univerzitet u Novom Sadu..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2348

Korolija M. Hladni rat u nauci Jugoslavije: odnos nauke i političke ideologije u FNRJ. in Peti međunarodni interdisciplinarni skup društvenih i humanističkih nauka Konteksti. 2019;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2348 .

Korolija, Maja, "Hladni rat u nauci Jugoslavije: odnos nauke i političke ideologije u FNRJ" in Peti međunarodni interdisciplinarni skup društvenih i humanističkih nauka Konteksti (2019),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2348 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Korolija, Maja
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rimsi.imsi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2815
AB  - Our intent is to examine structural changes and newly arisen conditions in the realm of the organization of science in Yugoslavia after the rift between the USSR and the Federative People’s Republic of Yugoslavia in 1948. These events resulted in the creation of the assumptions for a “non-aligned science”, predicated on social and ideological structure based on a heterodox understanding and application of Marxist-Leninist ideology, dominant in the Eastern Block. Drawing on archive materials, official positions of the ruling Communist Party of Yugoslavia and legislation, we will follow the development of structure and dominant understanding of the organization of science in Yugoslavia, from classical Stalinist model, to “self managing socialist” model. Until the break with the USSR, Marxist Leninist understanding of scientific and sociopolitical circumstances was propagated, as opposed to different deficiencies inherent to “bourgeois” science. The rift with Stalin started the process of ideological transformation within Yugoslavia that was finalized in 1952, when the new ruling paradigm was inaugurated: self managing socialism, i.e. the Titoism.The structure of scientific work and the mode of science financing were changed, which led to the weakening of the centralization in the organization of the science itself. The role of the Council of the Academy of Sciences in managing and supervision of scientific work was substantially decreased. This also impacted on the change in the nature of the dominant scientific paradigm, which was mainly defined by the context of the Cold War. By analyzing the introduction of the concept of scientific “sovereignty” and the impact of other liberal elements in the Yugoslav scientific practice, we will try to underscore certain social systematic features giving rise to a specific “non aligned” version of the socialist organization of science.
PB  - The European Society for the History of Science
C3  - ESHS Early career Scholar Conference: Transcultural Knowledge
T1  - Structural assumptions of the emergence of the Non-aligned Science
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2815
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Korolija, Maja",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Our intent is to examine structural changes and newly arisen conditions in the realm of the organization of science in Yugoslavia after the rift between the USSR and the Federative People’s Republic of Yugoslavia in 1948. These events resulted in the creation of the assumptions for a “non-aligned science”, predicated on social and ideological structure based on a heterodox understanding and application of Marxist-Leninist ideology, dominant in the Eastern Block. Drawing on archive materials, official positions of the ruling Communist Party of Yugoslavia and legislation, we will follow the development of structure and dominant understanding of the organization of science in Yugoslavia, from classical Stalinist model, to “self managing socialist” model. Until the break with the USSR, Marxist Leninist understanding of scientific and sociopolitical circumstances was propagated, as opposed to different deficiencies inherent to “bourgeois” science. The rift with Stalin started the process of ideological transformation within Yugoslavia that was finalized in 1952, when the new ruling paradigm was inaugurated: self managing socialism, i.e. the Titoism.The structure of scientific work and the mode of science financing were changed, which led to the weakening of the centralization in the organization of the science itself. The role of the Council of the Academy of Sciences in managing and supervision of scientific work was substantially decreased. This also impacted on the change in the nature of the dominant scientific paradigm, which was mainly defined by the context of the Cold War. By analyzing the introduction of the concept of scientific “sovereignty” and the impact of other liberal elements in the Yugoslav scientific practice, we will try to underscore certain social systematic features giving rise to a specific “non aligned” version of the socialist organization of science.",
publisher = "The European Society for the History of Science",
journal = "ESHS Early career Scholar Conference: Transcultural Knowledge",
title = "Structural assumptions of the emergence of the Non-aligned Science",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2815"
}

Korolija, M.. (2019). Structural assumptions of the emergence of the Non-aligned Science. in ESHS Early career Scholar Conference: Transcultural Knowledge
The European Society for the History of Science..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2815

Korolija M. Structural assumptions of the emergence of the Non-aligned Science. in ESHS Early career Scholar Conference: Transcultural Knowledge. 2019;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2815 .

Korolija, Maja, "Structural assumptions of the emergence of the Non-aligned Science" in ESHS Early career Scholar Conference: Transcultural Knowledge (2019),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2815 .

TY  - CONF
AU  - Korolija, Maja
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rimsi.imsi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1595
AB  - Namera je da se u radu ukratko prikaže početak jugoslovenskog nuklearnog programa. U radu se ispituju kako specifičnosti konteksta Hladnog rata, tako i uloga i primena nauke, prvenstveno nuklearne fizike, u tom periodu. U radu se analizira geopolitički položaj FNRJ nakon prekida saradnje sa SSSR-om 1948. godine i fokus jugoslovenskog političkog vrha na razvoj nuklearnog programa, uz prikaz osnovnih podataka o institutima u kojima se on sprovodio. U ovom kontekstu prikazuje se dinamika odnosa između predstavnika vlasti i naučnika, i razmatra se značaj tih odnosa za jugoslovenski nuklearni program.
AB  - Our intention is to present basic outlines of the beginnings of Yugoslav nuclear program. In the paper we examine specifics of the Cold War context, as well as the role and application of science, notably nuclear physics, in that period. The paper is analyzing geopolitical position of FPRY after break with USSR in 1948. and the focus of the Yugoslav political leadership on the development of the nuclear program, while reviewing basic information on the institutes in which this program was developed. In this context dynamics of the relations between representatives of the government and scientists, and importance of those relations for the Yugoslav nuclear program is depicted.
PB  - Beograd: Društvo za ETRAN
PB  - Beograd: Akademska misao
C3  - Zbornik radova (Ic)ETRAN
T1  - Preliminarni pregled početaka jugoslovenskog nuklearnog programa
T1  - Preliminary review of the beginnings of the Yugoslav nuclear program
EP  - 720
SP  - 715
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_1595
ER  - 

@conference{
author = "Korolija, Maja",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Namera je da se u radu ukratko prikaže početak jugoslovenskog nuklearnog programa. U radu se ispituju kako specifičnosti konteksta Hladnog rata, tako i uloga i primena nauke, prvenstveno nuklearne fizike, u tom periodu. U radu se analizira geopolitički položaj FNRJ nakon prekida saradnje sa SSSR-om 1948. godine i fokus jugoslovenskog političkog vrha na razvoj nuklearnog programa, uz prikaz osnovnih podataka o institutima u kojima se on sprovodio. U ovom kontekstu prikazuje se dinamika odnosa između predstavnika vlasti i naučnika, i razmatra se značaj tih odnosa za jugoslovenski nuklearni program., Our intention is to present basic outlines of the beginnings of Yugoslav nuclear program. In the paper we examine specifics of the Cold War context, as well as the role and application of science, notably nuclear physics, in that period. The paper is analyzing geopolitical position of FPRY after break with USSR in 1948. and the focus of the Yugoslav political leadership on the development of the nuclear program, while reviewing basic information on the institutes in which this program was developed. In this context dynamics of the relations between representatives of the government and scientists, and importance of those relations for the Yugoslav nuclear program is depicted.",
publisher = "Beograd: Društvo za ETRAN, Beograd: Akademska misao",
journal = "Zbornik radova (Ic)ETRAN",
title = "Preliminarni pregled početaka jugoslovenskog nuklearnog programa, Preliminary review of the beginnings of the Yugoslav nuclear program",
pages = "720-715",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_1595"
}

Korolija, M.. (2019). Preliminarni pregled početaka jugoslovenskog nuklearnog programa. in Zbornik radova (Ic)ETRAN
Beograd: Društvo za ETRAN., 715-720.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_1595

Korolija M. Preliminarni pregled početaka jugoslovenskog nuklearnog programa. in Zbornik radova (Ic)ETRAN. 2019;:715-720.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_1595 .

Korolija, Maja, "Preliminarni pregled početaka jugoslovenskog nuklearnog programa" in Zbornik radova (Ic)ETRAN (2019):715-720,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_1595 .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Korolija, Maja
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rimsi.imsi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2350
AB  - The phenomenon of forced evictions and the organized resistance of citizens from below can be found throughout the world. In this piece we intend to briefly present this phenomenon in Serbia, and in the Eastern European context, which shares certain characteristics with Serbia due to some common elements of socialist heritage in these countries. The phenomenon of forced evictions appeared in this region with the so-called process of democratic transition, and is intensified by the strengthening of the global economic crisis. At the legal level, it is the result of the process of ownership transformation, the emergence of the heirs to the ruling class from the period prior to real-socialism, and the general impoverishment of the population, which is unable to sustain the imposed neoliberal pace of life on the periphery of the capitalist system. The state in these countries first stopped taking care of the housing issue for the population, and then began battling those who tried to solve it themselves. But both in the countries of the former eastern bloc and in the countries of the former Yugoslavia, the way in which this happens varies.
PB  - Democratic Engagement in South East Europe: Stories to be Told
T2  - Democratic Engagement in South East Europe: Stories to be Told
T1  - Forced Evictions and Resistance from Below
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2350
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Korolija, Maja",
year = "2018",
abstract = "The phenomenon of forced evictions and the organized resistance of citizens from below can be found throughout the world. In this piece we intend to briefly present this phenomenon in Serbia, and in the Eastern European context, which shares certain characteristics with Serbia due to some common elements of socialist heritage in these countries. The phenomenon of forced evictions appeared in this region with the so-called process of democratic transition, and is intensified by the strengthening of the global economic crisis. At the legal level, it is the result of the process of ownership transformation, the emergence of the heirs to the ruling class from the period prior to real-socialism, and the general impoverishment of the population, which is unable to sustain the imposed neoliberal pace of life on the periphery of the capitalist system. The state in these countries first stopped taking care of the housing issue for the population, and then began battling those who tried to solve it themselves. But both in the countries of the former eastern bloc and in the countries of the former Yugoslavia, the way in which this happens varies.",
publisher = "Democratic Engagement in South East Europe: Stories to be Told",
journal = "Democratic Engagement in South East Europe: Stories to be Told",
booktitle = "Forced Evictions and Resistance from Below",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2350"
}

Korolija, M.. (2018). Forced Evictions and Resistance from Below. in Democratic Engagement in South East Europe: Stories to be Told
Democratic Engagement in South East Europe: Stories to be Told..
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2350

Korolija M. Forced Evictions and Resistance from Below. in Democratic Engagement in South East Europe: Stories to be Told. 2018;.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2350 .

Korolija, Maja, "Forced Evictions and Resistance from Below" in Democratic Engagement in South East Europe: Stories to be Told (2018),
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_2350 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Korolija, Maja
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rimsi.imsi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1594
AB  - Тема овог рада јесте критичка анализа схватања алхемије у истраживањима научника Симе Лозанића, на основу његовог јавно одржаног предавања Света вештина и алхемија. Посматрајући алхемију првенствено из перспективе модерног хемичара, Лозанић je, фокусиран на њен значај за научну мисао, приказује само као једну од „опскурних” фаза у развоју хемије. Међутим, поједини историчари науке указују на потребу да се алхемија сагледа у ширем контекстном значењу. У питању је читава филозофска парадигма, која у себи садржи преплитање практичних и духовних пракси, спроведених с циљем човековог усавршавања на његовом путу ка (само)спознаји.
AB  - The subject of this paper is a critical analysis of the Sima Lozanić’s understanding of alchemy, based on his public lecture Sacred Skill and Alchemy. Looking at the alchemy firstly from the perspective of a modern chemist, Lozanić, focused on its importance for the scientific thought, presents it like it is just another “obscure” phase in the development of chemistry. However, certain science historians point out the need to look at the alchemy from a wider perspective. It is a whole philosophical paradigm, which includes a constant intertwining of practical and spiritual practices, with the aim of man’s improvement on his way to (self)realization.
PB  - Београд: Музеј науке и технике
T2  - Флогистон/Phlogiston
T1  - Схватање алхемије код Симе Лозанића
T1  - Sima Lozanić’s understanding of alchemy
EP  - 320
IS  - 26
SP  - 297
VL  - 1
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_1594
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Korolija, Maja",
year = "2018",
abstract = "Тема овог рада јесте критичка анализа схватања алхемије у истраживањима научника Симе Лозанића, на основу његовог јавно одржаног предавања Света вештина и алхемија. Посматрајући алхемију првенствено из перспективе модерног хемичара, Лозанић je, фокусиран на њен значај за научну мисао, приказује само као једну од „опскурних” фаза у развоју хемије. Међутим, поједини историчари науке указују на потребу да се алхемија сагледа у ширем контекстном значењу. У питању је читава филозофска парадигма, која у себи садржи преплитање практичних и духовних пракси, спроведених с циљем човековог усавршавања на његовом путу ка (само)спознаји., The subject of this paper is a critical analysis of the Sima Lozanić’s understanding of alchemy, based on his public lecture Sacred Skill and Alchemy. Looking at the alchemy firstly from the perspective of a modern chemist, Lozanić, focused on its importance for the scientific thought, presents it like it is just another “obscure” phase in the development of chemistry. However, certain science historians point out the need to look at the alchemy from a wider perspective. It is a whole philosophical paradigm, which includes a constant intertwining of practical and spiritual practices, with the aim of man’s improvement on his way to (self)realization.",
publisher = "Београд: Музеј науке и технике",
journal = "Флогистон/Phlogiston",
title = "Схватање алхемије код Симе Лозанића, Sima Lozanić’s understanding of alchemy",
pages = "320-297",
number = "26",
volume = "1",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_1594"
}

Korolija, M.. (2018). Схватање алхемије код Симе Лозанића. in Флогистон/Phlogiston
Београд: Музеј науке и технике., 1(26), 297-320.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_1594

Korolija M. Схватање алхемије код Симе Лозанића. in Флогистон/Phlogiston. 2018;1(26):297-320.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_1594 .

Korolija, Maja, "Схватање алхемије код Симе Лозанића" in Флогистон/Phlogiston, 1, no. 26 (2018):297-320,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_1594 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Korolija, Maja
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://rimsi.imsi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1600
AB  - Namera nam je da sagledamo pitanje odnosa nauke i političke ideologije na primeru dinamike odnosa FNRJ i SSSR, odnosno njihovih naučnih politika. U tom smislu analiziraćemo istoriju saradnje, te praktične posledice prekida 1948. godine na obrazovni i naučni sistem FNRJ, sa osvrtom na ekonomsko-političku transformaciju u kontekstu hladnog rata. Prikazaćemo kako je u naučno-obrazovnom polju u FNRJ takođe započeta transformacija u skladu sa liberalnim zaokretom, koji je u ideološkom smislu društvo vodio u novu vladajuću paradigmu – Titoizam. U odnosu na dotadašnju marksističko-lenjinističku poziciju, zbog koje se Jugoslavija i u pitanju naučne politike i organizacije nauke ugledala na SSSR, fokus se sa teze o potrebi preplitanja nauke i društvenih potreba sada pomerio na ideju o naučnoj „suverenosti“. Opipljive posledice upliva ovih liberalnih ideoloških elemenata u nauku i obrazovni sistem bile su udaljavanje od društvenih problema i atomizacija u naučnoj organizaciji, a na obrazovnom planu, između ostalog, i smanjenje procenta opismenjenih. Analizirajući naučno-obrazovnu društvenu poziciju u kontekstu ovih političkih promena, nameće se zaključak da je ovo polje, baš kao i ostala društvena polja, u manjoj ili većoj meri bilo podređeno tržišnim potrebama.
AB  - Our intention is to consider the relation between science and political ideology in the case of the dynamics of the relation between the FPRY and the USSR, i.e. their science policies. In that sense, we will analyze the history of cooperation and the practical consequences of the break in 1948, in the field of the educational and scientific system of the FPRY, while considering economic and political transformation in context of the Cold War. We will show that in the scientific field in the FPRY, a transformation has also begun in accordance with this liberal turn, which in ideological terms led the society to the new ruling paradigm – Titoism. In relation to the previous, Marxist-Leninist position – due to which Yugoslavia, in terms of science policy and organization of science, as well as other fields, was modeled after USSR – the focus now has been moved from the thesis of interweaving science and social needs to the idea of “sovereignty” of science. Tangible consequences of the influence of these liberal ideological elements in science and the educational system were a departure from social problems and atomization of scientific organization, while in the educational field, among other things, a decrease in the literacy rate is noted. Through this analyses of the scientific and educational social position in the context of these political changes, the conclusion can be drawn that this field, just like other social fields, was more or less subordinated to the market needs.
PB  - Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo
T1  - Relacija nauke i političke ideologije na primerima iz oblasti nauke i obrazovanja u odnosima SSSR i FNRJ
T1  - Relation of Science and Political Ideology with Examples from Science and Education Field in Relations between USSR and FPRY
EP  - 1171
IS  - 4
SP  - 1160
VL  - 28
DO  - 10.2298/FID1704160K
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Korolija, Maja",
year = "2017",
abstract = "Namera nam je da sagledamo pitanje odnosa nauke i političke ideologije na primeru dinamike odnosa FNRJ i SSSR, odnosno njihovih naučnih politika. U tom smislu analiziraćemo istoriju saradnje, te praktične posledice prekida 1948. godine na obrazovni i naučni sistem FNRJ, sa osvrtom na ekonomsko-političku transformaciju u kontekstu hladnog rata. Prikazaćemo kako je u naučno-obrazovnom polju u FNRJ takođe započeta transformacija u skladu sa liberalnim zaokretom, koji je u ideološkom smislu društvo vodio u novu vladajuću paradigmu – Titoizam. U odnosu na dotadašnju marksističko-lenjinističku poziciju, zbog koje se Jugoslavija i u pitanju naučne politike i organizacije nauke ugledala na SSSR, fokus se sa teze o potrebi preplitanja nauke i društvenih potreba sada pomerio na ideju o naučnoj „suverenosti“. Opipljive posledice upliva ovih liberalnih ideoloških elemenata u nauku i obrazovni sistem bile su udaljavanje od društvenih problema i atomizacija u naučnoj organizaciji, a na obrazovnom planu, između ostalog, i smanjenje procenta opismenjenih. Analizirajući naučno-obrazovnu društvenu poziciju u kontekstu ovih političkih promena, nameće se zaključak da je ovo polje, baš kao i ostala društvena polja, u manjoj ili većoj meri bilo podređeno tržišnim potrebama., Our intention is to consider the relation between science and political ideology in the case of the dynamics of the relation between the FPRY and the USSR, i.e. their science policies. In that sense, we will analyze the history of cooperation and the practical consequences of the break in 1948, in the field of the educational and scientific system of the FPRY, while considering economic and political transformation in context of the Cold War. We will show that in the scientific field in the FPRY, a transformation has also begun in accordance with this liberal turn, which in ideological terms led the society to the new ruling paradigm – Titoism. In relation to the previous, Marxist-Leninist position – due to which Yugoslavia, in terms of science policy and organization of science, as well as other fields, was modeled after USSR – the focus now has been moved from the thesis of interweaving science and social needs to the idea of “sovereignty” of science. Tangible consequences of the influence of these liberal ideological elements in science and the educational system were a departure from social problems and atomization of scientific organization, while in the educational field, among other things, a decrease in the literacy rate is noted. Through this analyses of the scientific and educational social position in the context of these political changes, the conclusion can be drawn that this field, just like other social fields, was more or less subordinated to the market needs.",
publisher = "Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo",
title = "Relacija nauke i političke ideologije na primerima iz oblasti nauke i obrazovanja u odnosima SSSR i FNRJ, Relation of Science and Political Ideology with Examples from Science and Education Field in Relations between USSR and FPRY",
pages = "1171-1160",
number = "4",
volume = "28",
doi = "10.2298/FID1704160K"
}

Korolija, M.. (2017). Relacija nauke i političke ideologije na primerima iz oblasti nauke i obrazovanja u odnosima SSSR i FNRJ. in Filozofija i društvo
Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 28(4), 1160-1171.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1704160K

Korolija M. Relacija nauke i političke ideologije na primerima iz oblasti nauke i obrazovanja u odnosima SSSR i FNRJ. in Filozofija i društvo. 2017;28(4):1160-1171.
doi:10.2298/FID1704160K .

Korolija, Maja, "Relacija nauke i političke ideologije na primerima iz oblasti nauke i obrazovanja u odnosima SSSR i FNRJ" in Filozofija i društvo, 28, no. 4 (2017):1160-1171,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1704160K . .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Ćeriman, Jelena
AU  - Korolija, Maja
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://rimsi.imsi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1596
AB  - Intervencije kojima se namerava postići efektivnost u polju socijalnih politika moraju biti usmerene na područja u kojima se formiraju koreni nejednakosti. Rodne nejednakosti u okviru porodice i domaćinstva predstavljaju područje koje je manje propustljivo za neposrednije intervencije institucionalnih praksi i politika te time čini područje generisanja i reprodukovanja nejednakosti. Ipak, istovremeno,porodica i domaćinstvo mogu biti i područja promene rodnih odnosa (Babović 2010: 302). Dakako, oblikovanje društvenih struktura i odnosa daleko je složeniji proces od ponuđenog jednostavnog determinističkog modela. To ipak ne oslobađa tvorce socijalnih politika odgovornosti za nepreduzimanje obuhvatnih i sistematskih napora da se promene uslovi uspostavljanja i reprodukovanja rodnih nejednakosti u društvu. Značajnu ulogu u njihovom reprodukovanju imaju kulturni obrasci koji sadrže norme o primerenim rodnim ulogama žena i muškaraca, te je jedan deo ovog istraživanja posvećen tom pitanju, jer je za unapređenje socijalnih politika neophodno napraviti i procenu potreba osoba iz ruralnih područja. Sledi analiza ovog pitanja.
PB  - Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
PB  - Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga
PB  - Beograd: Centar za etiku, pravo i primenjenu filozofiju
T2  - Ruralnost i rod: Dostupnost i prepoznavanje programa socijalne zaštite
T1  - Analiza rodnih nejednakosti: moguća osnova socijalnih programa
EP  - 85
SP  - 74
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_1596
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Ćeriman, Jelena and Korolija, Maja",
year = "2016",
abstract = "Intervencije kojima se namerava postići efektivnost u polju socijalnih politika moraju biti usmerene na područja u kojima se formiraju koreni nejednakosti. Rodne nejednakosti u okviru porodice i domaćinstva predstavljaju područje koje je manje propustljivo za neposrednije intervencije institucionalnih praksi i politika te time čini područje generisanja i reprodukovanja nejednakosti. Ipak, istovremeno,porodica i domaćinstvo mogu biti i područja promene rodnih odnosa (Babović 2010: 302). Dakako, oblikovanje društvenih struktura i odnosa daleko je složeniji proces od ponuđenog jednostavnog determinističkog modela. To ipak ne oslobađa tvorce socijalnih politika odgovornosti za nepreduzimanje obuhvatnih i sistematskih napora da se promene uslovi uspostavljanja i reprodukovanja rodnih nejednakosti u društvu. Značajnu ulogu u njihovom reprodukovanju imaju kulturni obrasci koji sadrže norme o primerenim rodnim ulogama žena i muškaraca, te je jedan deo ovog istraživanja posvećen tom pitanju, jer je za unapređenje socijalnih politika neophodno napraviti i procenu potreba osoba iz ruralnih područja. Sledi analiza ovog pitanja.",
publisher = "Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga, Beograd: Centar za etiku, pravo i primenjenu filozofiju",
journal = "Ruralnost i rod: Dostupnost i prepoznavanje programa socijalne zaštite",
booktitle = "Analiza rodnih nejednakosti: moguća osnova socijalnih programa",
pages = "85-74",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_1596"
}

Ćeriman, J.,& Korolija, M.. (2016). Analiza rodnih nejednakosti: moguća osnova socijalnih programa. in Ruralnost i rod: Dostupnost i prepoznavanje programa socijalne zaštite
Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 74-85.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_1596

Ćeriman J, Korolija M. Analiza rodnih nejednakosti: moguća osnova socijalnih programa. in Ruralnost i rod: Dostupnost i prepoznavanje programa socijalne zaštite. 2016;:74-85.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_1596 .

Ćeriman, Jelena, Korolija, Maja, "Analiza rodnih nejednakosti: moguća osnova socijalnih programa" in Ruralnost i rod: Dostupnost i prepoznavanje programa socijalne zaštite (2016):74-85,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rimsi_1596 .