In this paper we compared a resistive and capacitive strain gauge in terms of sensitivity and material cost, both printed with deposition material printer using silver nanoparticle ink on a flexible polyimide substrate. The resistive change due to strain was measured with a full Wheatstone bridge and a signal conditioning circuit, while the capacitance change was measured with the HP4194A impedance analyzer. Measured and derived strain gauge factor for resistive sensor was 1.10, and 0.91 for the capacitive sensor.
TY - CONF
AU - Zlebic, C.
AU - Ivanisević, N.
AU - Kisic, M.
AU - Blaz, Nelu V.
AU - Menićanin, Aleksandar
AU - Živanov, Ljiljana D
AU - Damnjanović, M.
PY - 2014
UR - http://rimsi.imsi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/746
AB - In this paper we compared a resistive and capacitive strain gauge in terms of sensitivity and material cost, both printed with deposition material printer using silver nanoparticle ink on a flexible polyimide substrate. The resistive change due to strain was measured with a full Wheatstone bridge and a signal conditioning circuit, while the capacitance change was measured with the HP4194A impedance analyzer. Measured and derived strain gauge factor for resistive sensor was 1.10, and 0.91 for the capacitive sensor.
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
C3 - Proceedings of the International Conference on Microelectronics, ICM
T1 - Comparison of Resistive and Capacitive Strain Gauge Sensors Printed on Polyimide Substrate Using Ink-Jet Printing Technology
EP - 144
SP - 141
DO - 10.1109/MIEL.2014.6842105
ER -
@conference{
author = "Zlebic, C. and Ivanisević, N. and Kisic, M. and Blaz, Nelu V. and Menićanin, Aleksandar and Živanov, Ljiljana D and Damnjanović, M.",
year = "2014",
abstract = "In this paper we compared a resistive and capacitive strain gauge in terms of sensitivity and material cost, both printed with deposition material printer using silver nanoparticle ink on a flexible polyimide substrate. The resistive change due to strain was measured with a full Wheatstone bridge and a signal conditioning circuit, while the capacitance change was measured with the HP4194A impedance analyzer. Measured and derived strain gauge factor for resistive sensor was 1.10, and 0.91 for the capacitive sensor.",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
journal = "Proceedings of the International Conference on Microelectronics, ICM",
title = "Comparison of Resistive and Capacitive Strain Gauge Sensors Printed on Polyimide Substrate Using Ink-Jet Printing Technology",
pages = "144-141",
doi = "10.1109/MIEL.2014.6842105"
}
Zlebic, C., Ivanisević, N., Kisic, M., Blaz, N. V., Menićanin, A., Živanov, L. D.,& Damnjanović, M.. (2014). Comparison of Resistive and Capacitive Strain Gauge Sensors Printed on Polyimide Substrate Using Ink-Jet Printing Technology. in Proceedings of the International Conference on Microelectronics, ICM
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.., 141-144.
https://doi.org/10.1109/MIEL.2014.6842105
Zlebic C, Ivanisević N, Kisic M, Blaz NV, Menićanin A, Živanov LD, Damnjanović M. Comparison of Resistive and Capacitive Strain Gauge Sensors Printed on Polyimide Substrate Using Ink-Jet Printing Technology. in Proceedings of the International Conference on Microelectronics, ICM. 2014;:141-144.
doi:10.1109/MIEL.2014.6842105 .
Zlebic, C., Ivanisević, N., Kisic, M., Blaz, Nelu V., Menićanin, Aleksandar, Živanov, Ljiljana D, Damnjanović, M., "Comparison of Resistive and Capacitive Strain Gauge Sensors Printed on Polyimide Substrate Using Ink-Jet Printing Technology" in Proceedings of the International Conference on Microelectronics, ICM (2014):141-144,
https://doi.org/10.1109/MIEL.2014.6842105 . .
