In situ detection of the genotoxic potential as one of the lines of evidence in the weight-of-evidence approach—the Joint Danube Survey 4 Case Study
Authorized Users Only
2023
Authors
Jovanović Marić, JovanaKolarević, Stoimir
Đorđević Aleksić, Jelena

Sunjog, Karolina
Nikolić, Ivan
Marić, Ana
Ilić, Marija
Simonović, Predrag

Alygizakis, Nikiforos
Ng, Kilsey
Oswald, Petar
Slobodnik, Jaroslav

Žegura, Bojana
Vuković-Gačić, Branka
Paunović, Momir
Kračun-Kolarević, Margareta
Article (Published version)

Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Environmental studies which aim to assess the ecological impact of chemical and other types of pollution should employ a complex weight-of-evidence approach with multiple lines of evidence (LoEs). This study focused on in situ genotoxicological methods such as the comet and micronucleus assays and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis as one of the multiple LoEs (LoE3) on the fish species Alburnus alburnus (bleak) as a bioindicator. The study was carried out within the Joint Danube Survey 4 (JDS4) at nine sites in the Danube River Basin in the Republic of Serbia. Out of nine sampling sites, two were situated at the Tisa, Sava, and Velika Morava rivers, and three sites were at the Danube River. The three additionally employed LoEs were: SumTUwater calculated based on the monitoring data in the database of the Serbian Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) (LoE1); in vitro analyses of JDS4 water extracts employing genotoxicological methods (LoE2); assessment of the ecological statu...s/potential by SEPA and indication of the ecological status for the sites performed within the JDS4 (LoE4). The analyzed biomarker responses in the bleak were integrated into the unique integrated biomarker response index which was used to rank the sites. The highest pollution pressure was recorded at JDS4 39 and JDS4 36, while the lowest was at JDS4 35. The impact of pollution was confirmed at three sites, JDS4 33, 40, and 41, by all four LoEs. At other sampling sites, a difference was observed regarding the pollution depending on the employed LoEs. This indicates the importance of implementing a comprehensive weight-of-evidence approach to ensure the impact of pollution is not overlooked when using only one LoE as is often the case in environmental studies.
Keywords:
genotoxic potential / Alburnus alburnus / Joint Danube Survey 4 / comet assay / weight-of-evidence approachSource:
Mutagenesis, 2023, 38, 1, 21-32Publisher:
- Oxford University Press
Funding / projects:
- "info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/inst-2020/200007/RS//" (RS-200007)
- info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/BI-RS/18-19-029/RS/Bilateral project of the Republic of Serbia and the Republic of Slovenia/ (RS-18-19-029)
- the Slovenian Research Agency (Program P1-0245)
Collections
Institution/Community
Institut za multidisciplinarna istraživanjaTY - JOUR AU - Jovanović Marić, Jovana AU - Kolarević, Stoimir AU - Đorđević Aleksić, Jelena AU - Sunjog, Karolina AU - Nikolić, Ivan AU - Marić, Ana AU - Ilić, Marija AU - Simonović, Predrag AU - Alygizakis, Nikiforos AU - Ng, Kilsey AU - Oswald, Petar AU - Slobodnik, Jaroslav AU - Žegura, Bojana AU - Vuković-Gačić, Branka AU - Paunović, Momir AU - Kračun-Kolarević, Margareta PY - 2023 UR - http://rimsi.imsi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2044 AB - Environmental studies which aim to assess the ecological impact of chemical and other types of pollution should employ a complex weight-of-evidence approach with multiple lines of evidence (LoEs). This study focused on in situ genotoxicological methods such as the comet and micronucleus assays and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis as one of the multiple LoEs (LoE3) on the fish species Alburnus alburnus (bleak) as a bioindicator. The study was carried out within the Joint Danube Survey 4 (JDS4) at nine sites in the Danube River Basin in the Republic of Serbia. Out of nine sampling sites, two were situated at the Tisa, Sava, and Velika Morava rivers, and three sites were at the Danube River. The three additionally employed LoEs were: SumTUwater calculated based on the monitoring data in the database of the Serbian Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) (LoE1); in vitro analyses of JDS4 water extracts employing genotoxicological methods (LoE2); assessment of the ecological status/potential by SEPA and indication of the ecological status for the sites performed within the JDS4 (LoE4). The analyzed biomarker responses in the bleak were integrated into the unique integrated biomarker response index which was used to rank the sites. The highest pollution pressure was recorded at JDS4 39 and JDS4 36, while the lowest was at JDS4 35. The impact of pollution was confirmed at three sites, JDS4 33, 40, and 41, by all four LoEs. At other sampling sites, a difference was observed regarding the pollution depending on the employed LoEs. This indicates the importance of implementing a comprehensive weight-of-evidence approach to ensure the impact of pollution is not overlooked when using only one LoE as is often the case in environmental studies. PB - Oxford University Press T2 - Mutagenesis T1 - In situ detection of the genotoxic potential as one of the lines of evidence in the weight-of-evidence approach—the Joint Danube Survey 4 Case Study EP - 32 IS - 1 SP - 21 VL - 38 DO - 10.1093/mutage/geac024 ER -
@article{ author = "Jovanović Marić, Jovana and Kolarević, Stoimir and Đorđević Aleksić, Jelena and Sunjog, Karolina and Nikolić, Ivan and Marić, Ana and Ilić, Marija and Simonović, Predrag and Alygizakis, Nikiforos and Ng, Kilsey and Oswald, Petar and Slobodnik, Jaroslav and Žegura, Bojana and Vuković-Gačić, Branka and Paunović, Momir and Kračun-Kolarević, Margareta", year = "2023", abstract = "Environmental studies which aim to assess the ecological impact of chemical and other types of pollution should employ a complex weight-of-evidence approach with multiple lines of evidence (LoEs). This study focused on in situ genotoxicological methods such as the comet and micronucleus assays and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis as one of the multiple LoEs (LoE3) on the fish species Alburnus alburnus (bleak) as a bioindicator. The study was carried out within the Joint Danube Survey 4 (JDS4) at nine sites in the Danube River Basin in the Republic of Serbia. Out of nine sampling sites, two were situated at the Tisa, Sava, and Velika Morava rivers, and three sites were at the Danube River. The three additionally employed LoEs were: SumTUwater calculated based on the monitoring data in the database of the Serbian Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) (LoE1); in vitro analyses of JDS4 water extracts employing genotoxicological methods (LoE2); assessment of the ecological status/potential by SEPA and indication of the ecological status for the sites performed within the JDS4 (LoE4). The analyzed biomarker responses in the bleak were integrated into the unique integrated biomarker response index which was used to rank the sites. The highest pollution pressure was recorded at JDS4 39 and JDS4 36, while the lowest was at JDS4 35. The impact of pollution was confirmed at three sites, JDS4 33, 40, and 41, by all four LoEs. At other sampling sites, a difference was observed regarding the pollution depending on the employed LoEs. This indicates the importance of implementing a comprehensive weight-of-evidence approach to ensure the impact of pollution is not overlooked when using only one LoE as is often the case in environmental studies.", publisher = "Oxford University Press", journal = "Mutagenesis", title = "In situ detection of the genotoxic potential as one of the lines of evidence in the weight-of-evidence approach—the Joint Danube Survey 4 Case Study", pages = "32-21", number = "1", volume = "38", doi = "10.1093/mutage/geac024" }
Jovanović Marić, J., Kolarević, S., Đorđević Aleksić, J., Sunjog, K., Nikolić, I., Marić, A., Ilić, M., Simonović, P., Alygizakis, N., Ng, K., Oswald, P., Slobodnik, J., Žegura, B., Vuković-Gačić, B., Paunović, M.,& Kračun-Kolarević, M.. (2023). In situ detection of the genotoxic potential as one of the lines of evidence in the weight-of-evidence approach—the Joint Danube Survey 4 Case Study. in Mutagenesis Oxford University Press., 38(1), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/geac024
Jovanović Marić J, Kolarević S, Đorđević Aleksić J, Sunjog K, Nikolić I, Marić A, Ilić M, Simonović P, Alygizakis N, Ng K, Oswald P, Slobodnik J, Žegura B, Vuković-Gačić B, Paunović M, Kračun-Kolarević M. In situ detection of the genotoxic potential as one of the lines of evidence in the weight-of-evidence approach—the Joint Danube Survey 4 Case Study. in Mutagenesis. 2023;38(1):21-32. doi:10.1093/mutage/geac024 .
Jovanović Marić, Jovana, Kolarević, Stoimir, Đorđević Aleksić, Jelena, Sunjog, Karolina, Nikolić, Ivan, Marić, Ana, Ilić, Marija, Simonović, Predrag, Alygizakis, Nikiforos, Ng, Kilsey, Oswald, Petar, Slobodnik, Jaroslav, Žegura, Bojana, Vuković-Gačić, Branka, Paunović, Momir, Kračun-Kolarević, Margareta, "In situ detection of the genotoxic potential as one of the lines of evidence in the weight-of-evidence approach—the Joint Danube Survey 4 Case Study" in Mutagenesis, 38, no. 1 (2023):21-32, https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/geac024 . .