Приказ основних података о документу

dc.creatorJovanović Marić, Jovana
dc.creatorKolarević, Stoimir
dc.creatorĐorđević Aleksić, Jelena
dc.creatorSunjog, Karolina
dc.creatorNikolić, Ivan
dc.creatorMarić, Ana
dc.creatorIlić, Marija
dc.creatorSimonović, Predrag
dc.creatorAlygizakis, Nikiforos
dc.creatorNg, Kilsey
dc.creatorOswald, Petar
dc.creatorSlobodnik, Jaroslav
dc.creatorŽegura, Bojana
dc.creatorVuković-Gačić, Branka
dc.creatorPaunović, Momir
dc.creatorKračun-Kolarević, Margareta
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-08T09:45:57Z
dc.date.available2023-08-08T09:45:57Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn0267-8357
dc.identifier.urihttp://rimsi.imsi.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2044
dc.description.abstractEnvironmental studies which aim to assess the ecological impact of chemical and other types of pollution should employ a complex weight-of-evidence approach with multiple lines of evidence (LoEs). This study focused on in situ genotoxicological methods such as the comet and micronucleus assays and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis as one of the multiple LoEs (LoE3) on the fish species Alburnus alburnus (bleak) as a bioindicator. The study was carried out within the Joint Danube Survey 4 (JDS4) at nine sites in the Danube River Basin in the Republic of Serbia. Out of nine sampling sites, two were situated at the Tisa, Sava, and Velika Morava rivers, and three sites were at the Danube River. The three additionally employed LoEs were: SumTUwater calculated based on the monitoring data in the database of the Serbian Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) (LoE1); in vitro analyses of JDS4 water extracts employing genotoxicological methods (LoE2); assessment of the ecological status/potential by SEPA and indication of the ecological status for the sites performed within the JDS4 (LoE4). The analyzed biomarker responses in the bleak were integrated into the unique integrated biomarker response index which was used to rank the sites. The highest pollution pressure was recorded at JDS4 39 and JDS4 36, while the lowest was at JDS4 35. The impact of pollution was confirmed at three sites, JDS4 33, 40, and 41, by all four LoEs. At other sampling sites, a difference was observed regarding the pollution depending on the employed LoEs. This indicates the importance of implementing a comprehensive weight-of-evidence approach to ensure the impact of pollution is not overlooked when using only one LoE as is often the case in environmental studies.sr
dc.language.isoensr
dc.publisherOxford University Presssr
dc.relation"info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/inst-2020/200007/RS//"sr
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/BI-RS/18-19-029/RS/Bilateral project of the Republic of Serbia and the Republic of Slovenia/sr
dc.relationthe Slovenian Research Agency (Program P1-0245)sr
dc.rightsclosedAccesssr
dc.sourceMutagenesissr
dc.subjectgenotoxic potentialsr
dc.subjectAlburnus alburnussr
dc.subjectJoint Danube Survey 4sr
dc.subjectcomet assaysr
dc.subjectweight-of-evidence approachsr
dc.titleIn situ detection of the genotoxic potential as one of the lines of evidence in the weight-of-evidence approach—the Joint Danube Survey 4 Case Studysr
dc.typearticlesr
dc.rights.licenseARRsr
dc.citation.epage32
dc.citation.issue1
dc.citation.spage21
dc.citation.volume38
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/mutage/geac024
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionsr


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу